
September 12, 2005 e-newsletter |
||||
| Special Interests Saw Gun Bill before Cities | ||||
Gas prices show folly of TABOR, Doyle-GOP 'freeze' |
| By Rich Eggleston Local government services in Wisconsin, 900 miles north of the devastation wrought by Hurricane Katrina, may be casualties of the gasoline price increases that the hurricane compounded as it hammered the Gulf Coasts oil platforms and refineries. Katrina was only delivering the second part of a one-two punch to local governments in Wisconsin. The first blow came from the Republican-sponsored property tax freeze, signed by Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle, which limits communities ability to cope in the face of natural disasters at home or far away. The knock-out punch would come if the state adopts a "Taxpayer's Bill of Rights" that would forever limit government's ability to deal with crises. In addition to citizens, police officers, firefighters and other local government employees may be the ultimate victims. Cities in Wisconsin are facing millions of dollars in increased gasoline and diesel fuel costs, an Alliance of Cities survey is finding. In Milwaukee, the city was looking to a $2.8 million increase in its cost of motor vehicle fuel, natural gas and electricity before Katrina hit. Milwaukee is allowed a $4 million increase in property tax revenue under the state budget bill, so that leaves $1.2 million to finance the increased cost of city services before those services are cut. Gasoline and diesel fuel cost increases likely in other Alliance cities that have responded so far, based on $3.50 per gallon fuel: Manitowoc, $340,000; Marshfield, $202,000; Menasha, $95,000; Merrill, $143,500; Oak Creek, $224,900; and Watertown, $80,000. Based on a 2001 Legislative Fiscal Bureau estimate of the total motor vehicle fuel used annually by counties, municipalities, local schools, UW campuses and technical colleges in the state, $3.50 gasoline would mean a $70 million increase in their gasoline and diesel fuel bill. Unlike consumers, local governments and schools have limited opportunities to conserve. Emergency vehicles must be fueled and ready to respond, school buses have to run their routes and snow plows cant plow the snow without fuel. "This is why levy limits dont work," said Edward J. Huck, Alliance of Cities executive director. "The Legislature and the governor have tied our hands behind our backs." |
Where are they now?
"You're going to let the guys who created a $3.2 billion deficit ... now tell you how you should run things at home? Those probably aren't the folks you want to get financial advice from." Rick Gale, president of Professional Firefighters of Wisconsin, August 2003.
"The property tax freeze proposal is another Republican red herring that would have resulted in immediate political gain and long term effects of catastrophic proportions." -- Bob Beglinger, president, Wisconsin Federation of Teachers, August 2003. |
|
Levy Limit Fallout
Sheboygan May Lay Off Dozens
|
Sheboygan Mayor Juan Perez says his city
faces a "fiscal nightmare" as a result of rising costs, flat state aids and
state levy limits, the Sheboygan Press reports. The mayor unveiled a proposed
city budget that calls for a 6.8% levy increase for 2006, including increased debt service
for a new police station and other projects. The city would still have to lay off 30 employees to make ends meet. "I categorize that as a fiscal nightmare," Mayor Perez told the Sheboygan Press. "My job is: cut out. It's going to be pretty hard for me to balance the budget without asking every department head, every (public employee) union, every alderman to work with me and cooperate in putting together a budget and shifting the funds we need to shift in a fair and equitable manner." "It's going to be ugly, that's all I know," Ald. Marilyn Montemayor told the newspaper. For the story, look here. |
|
Whitewater meetings Sept. 15-16
More technical answers to levy limit questions
Paul Ziegler of the Department of Revenue will answer levy-limit questions from Alliance finance directors and city leaders on Sept. 15 in Whitewater. Alliance members should have received e-mails with maps and directions for downloading conference materials. The DOR also has levy-limit questions and answers on its web site, where you can go by clicking here.
Here are questions from Kathy Unertl, finance director in Merrill, and Ziegler's responses, concerning city-county sharing of ambulance service costs.
"Lincoln County contracts with the Merrill Fire
Department to provide ambulance service for the southern 1/3rd of Lincoln County,"
Unertl wrote. "The County has been reimbursing the City for 6 1/2 ambulance
positions.
"Due to 65%+ Medicare/Medicaid runs, Lincoln County's tax levy is now over $500,000
for services provided by Merrill Fire Department and the Tomahawk Hospital, which
contracts to provide ambulance service for the northern third of Lincoln County.
"Due to the number of ambulance emergency responses compared to fire calls and
unwillingness of surrounding townships to continue to subsidize ambulance service through
their fire protection contracts, the City of Merrill has requested that Lincoln County
fund an additional three positions (i.e. about $245,000).
Q: 1) Are there any State Levy Implications to the
City of Merrill with this proposal for additional Lincoln County reimbursement? Since EMS
positions on the Merrill Fire Department are more like 15 positions than the 9 1/2
position reimbursement funding request, the City would continue to levy property tax for
ambulance service.
Clearly, Lincoln County would need to cover this additional amount under the County tax
levy amount.
A: Because the higher reimbursement from
Lincoln County to the City of Merrill would reflect higher costs of an existing service
agreement, rather than a new transfer of service, no adjustments would be made to the
allowable levies of either the city or the county.
While the city would receive additional funds from the county, this would not require any
downward adjustment in the city's maximum allowable levy. The county would need to pay the
higher amount out of the current maximum allowable levy or other revenue sources. The
county would not receive an upward adjustment for the higher payment.
Q: 2) Since there is no requirement under Wis.
Stats. for county involvement in ambulance service, what if Lincoln County stopped
contracting for service? Then, the City of Merrill would need to contract with surrounding
townships to provide ambulance service (or the townships could contract with another EMS
provider).
I think that this type of "transfer of service" would be exempt from the State
Levy Limits? There would be a substantial increase in City of Merrill property tax levy
[and contracting townships] with this type of shift.
A: If Lincoln County stopped contracting with the city for the provision
of ambulance services to certain towns, and instead, the City of Merrill directly
contracted with the towns to provide ambulance service, a transfer of service adjustment
could be made as follows:
1. The county would discontinue its role in providing
ambulance service. Consequently, the county's levy authority may be decreased by the
amount of savings to the county.
2. The towns newly contracting for the ambulance service from the city would be taking on
a new responsibility and may be granted an upward adjustment in their levy authority based
on their increased costs.
3. No adjustment would be made to the City of Merrill's levy authority. From the city's
perspective, it would be receiving revenue from the towns rather than the county, and in
essence, not change its role as a service provider to outlying areas.
In sum, this change would transfer responsibility for providing ambulance service from county government to the relevant towns.
I hope this is helpful.
Paul Ziegler
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Upcoming Events (click on underlined text for more)
| Sept. 15-16 | Alliance meetings | Whitewater | ||
| Sept. 20-29 | Legislative floor period (Tues.-Thurs.) | Madison | ||
| Sept. 23-24 | Lieut. Governor's childcare conference | Milwaukee | ||
| Sept. 29 | TDA 'Staying Connected' conference | Madison | ||
| Oct. 1-8 | Wisconsin Sustainability Fair | UW-Oshkosh | ||
| Oct. 25-Nov. 10 | Legislative floor period (Tues.-Thurs.) | Madison | ||
| Nov. 10-11 | Alliance meetings | Neenah | ||
| Nov. 30-Dec. 1 | Tobacco Prevention & Control Conference | Madison | ||
| Dec. 6-15 | Legislative floor period (Tues.-Thurs.) | Madison | ||
|
THE
WISCONSIN ALLIANCE OF CITIES
14 West Mifflin Street Suite 206
Madison, Wisconsin 53703
(608) 257-5881