
August 9, 2005 e-newsletter |
|||
| Levy Limits Generate Questions Governor embraces GOP freeze philosophy By Rich Eggleston Gov. Jim Doyle signed a Republican-sponsored levy limit proposal into law with only minor modifications, and left local officials across the state scratching their heads as to how they'll deal with it. While billed as a property tax freeze, it never was. The governor took the plan from a limit that allowed increases only for new construction (not normal growth in value) to one that allowed growth or 2%, whichever is greater. He also pared the limits from a three-year freeze to a two-year freeze. City leaders in the Alliance had said they could accept two-year levy limits with tools to hold down costs accompanying property-tax restrictions. There were no such tools provided in the budget bill. (Our plan is here.) City leaders say that spells problems in quite a few Alliance cities. In Madison, Mayor Dave Cieslewicz asked city departments to cut 3% from the budgets they submit to him. Due to rising costs, Madison must spend $9.5 million more next year to continue the same level of services. But the new tax limits are likely to allow the city to raise only $6 million more in property taxes, leaving a $3.5 million shortfall, the Wisconsin State Journal reported. |
|
"You've got a Republican majority in the Legislature ... that hasn't balanced budgets honestly telling local governments that have balanced budgets honestly how to run our businesses," Mayor Cieslewicz told the newspaper. "It's like Enron executives telling local groceries how to stock their shelves."
Madison's shortfall is almost sure to lead to police cuts, the State Journal reported in a story here. The Madison Fire Department, meanwhile, is in an even tighter spot because about 92 percent of its operating expenses are for personnel. In Marshfield, city officials are asking residents what services they would prefer to see cut, and UW-Marshfield is offering a course this fall on the city budget. Story here.
With looming projects such as building new police and fire stations, trying to maintain city services and attempting to negotiate contracts with city unions, Sheboygan Mayor Juan Perez said the limits would make the citys job more difficult. Now that we know what we have to work with, now its our responsibility to make our budget work, Perez told the Sheboygan Press. Story here.
Ed Huck, executive director of the Alliance, said the governor's action puts a potential crimp in local government's economic development activities.
"Are public-employee unions going to stand still for new TIF projects when their members are being laid off?" Huck asked.
The precise depth of our cities' budget woes won't be known until next week. Equalized value numbers and net new construction numbers for all municipalities in Wisconsin will be posted on the Department of Revenue web site by Aug. 15, maybe a day or two earlier, according to Audra Brennan, executive assistant in the DOR. They will determine levy limits for next year.
The larger of 2%, or the percentage that the previous year's net new construction (improvements added minus improvements demolished) represents of total equalized value, will be the allowable levy increase that Alliance members and other municipalities will be allowed for the next budget or the year after.
The partially vetoed levy-limit language is here.
Answers to technical questions on levy limits
In response to a question from Jean Vito, finance director in Superior, Paul Ziegler of DOR's division of research and analysis, agreed that communities that see a reduction in debt service costs in their next budget will have that much more wiggle room in their budgeting process: they won't have to reduce their levies by that amount.
Other guidance provided by the Department of Revenue staff in response to questions we forwarded to the administration:
1. Are both existing and new debt exempt from the levy freeze?
Yes -- in that the payment of neither existing nor new debt service is inhibited by the levy limit. There is a distinction, however, in how they are treated in calculating the limits. The amount levied for existing debt is included in the base for determining the allowable levy under the limit. In addition, an upward adjustment is made to the limit if debt service for existing debt increases over the prior year. Newly authorized debt, however, is completely exempt from the limit. It is not included in the base for determining the allowable increases.
2. Is the allowable levy increase calculated on the total levy from the prior year, or is the allowable increase calculated on the total levy less the debt service portion of the levy?
See the reply to the first question. In general, the allowable increase is calculated on the total levy from the prior year, including amounts levied for previously authorized debt. The calculation of the allowable increase would not include any debt newly authorized after July 1, 2005.
3. Is the allowable increase based on the levy before or after the levy increase for TIF districts?
Tax increments are excluded from the limits. Consequently, the base for the allowable increase would not include tax increments. While this exclusion does provide a smaller base upon which the allowable increase is determined, it is intended to make certain that development efforts through TIF are not impacted by the limits.
4. If the city authorized debt prior to July 1, 2005 but did not issue it until after that date, can this debt and subsequent increases in debt service be included in the base calculation?
s.66.0602(13)(d)1. provides an upward adjustment to the levy limit for increases in debt service for debt authorized prior to July 1, 2005. Consequently, the limit would be increased for additional debt service that relates to new, but previously authorized debt. In the first year of the adjustment, however, the adjustment is not included in the base for determining the allowable increase. It is, instead, added as additional amount that may be levied after the limit that would otherwise be allowed is determined. (In other words, in the first year of the additional debt service for previously authorized debt, there is no growth component applied to this increment.)
In the second year, any upward adjustment utilized under this section would become part of the base upon which the second year allowable increase would be determined.
|
Whitewater meetings Sept. 15-16
City leaders due for dose of history
|
Whitewater City Manager Kevin Brunner has a special treat planned for
Alliance members attending our Sept. 15 and 16 meetings at the Cravath Lakefront Center in
Whitewater. Thursday, we are invited to a reception at the Crossman
Gallery on the UW-Whitewater campus from 5:30 to 7 o'clock, to view "Sacred Legacy: The Photographs of Edward S. Curtis." The
exhibit showcases 70 of the images drawn from an ongoing European tour, and several
images never before seen in the United States. Born in Whitewater in 1868, Curtis began to photograph vanishing American Indian ceremonies and culture in 1900, a task he thought would take a few years. It took 30 years, and scholars say it ultimately cost him his family, his financial security and his health. Brunner his invited UW-Whitewater chancellor Martha Saunders to welcome the Alliance leaders at the reception. Of course, we'll have plenty of business to transact in Whitewater, but on the lighter side, we'll be dining after the Curtis reception at Fun Hunters Brewery in Whitewater. More details and an RSVP form will follow. |
|
|||||||||||||||||
A picture
is worth a thousand words...
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Upcoming Events (click on underlined text for more)
| Aug. 31 | Med-Arb bill (AB 268) public hearing | 9:30 a.m. Capitol | ||
| Sept. 14 | tentative Med-Arb bill exec | 10 a.m. Capitol | ||
| Sept. 15-16 | Alliance meetings | Whitewater | ||
| Oct. 1-8 | Wisconsin Sustainability Fair | UW-Oshkosh | ||
| Nov. 10-11 | Alliance meetings | Neenah | ||
| Nov. 30-Dec. 1 | Tobacco Prevention & Control Conference | Madison | ||
|
THE
WISCONSIN ALLIANCE OF CITIES
14 West Mifflin Street Suite 206
Madison, Wisconsin 53703
(608) 257-5881