Conversation with
the Public:
Marshfield Strives for Efficiency; Will It Be Enough?By Rich Eggleston
Marshfield has cut expenses and modernized wherever it
can, but the cost of city government is often beyond the city's control: its
health-insurance bill has doubled since 1994, while state law has effectively eliminated
local control over labor costs, City Administrator Mike Brehm told a "conversation
with the public" on May 11.

Ed Huck (l.) and Mike Brehm at Marshfield forum
|
At the same time, state aid
payments have shrunk in proportion to the city's expenses, and Marshfield's share of the
overall property tax bill in the city has risen nearly 10% in the last decade, Brehm told
the gathering at the Mother Frances Streitel Conference Center.
And city residents pay for more than a
million dollars worth of county services they don't receive as a result of "double
whammy" taxation that benefits towns, he added.
Now city officials are asking citizens where
they would like the city budget to be cut if trends continue. |
If a levy-limit proposal had been in effect this year, Marshfield would have had to cut
$1.5 million from its budget under the Legislature's plan, and $1.3 million under Gov. Jim
Doyle's, Brehm said.
Ed Huck, Alliance executive director, told
the forum that Marshfield isn't alone. State shared revenues have lost more than $200
million in buying power since 1995 and double-whammy taxation is a persistent, statewide
problem, he said. The resources available to finance government services are on a
collision course with citizens' demands for services, Huck added.
Both the City's and the Alliance's Power
Point presentations are available on Marshfield's web site, where you can go by clicking here.
An updated version of the Alliance
presentation is here.
The Marshfield News Herald story on
the conversation is here.
|
Mayor Hanna to Legislators:
'Focus on regional economic development'
Wisconsin and all its municipalities need to focus on
regional economic development, and the Alliance of Cities' proposed Regional Economic
Development Incentive is the ideal way to do that, Appleton Mayor Tim Hanna told the
League-Alliance legislative luncheon May 19.
Hours later, the Alliance's Board of Directors chose
Mayor Hanna president, succeeding former Greenfield Mayor Tim Seider. The board selected
Mayor Gary Becker of Racine vice president to succeed Mayor Hanna, and appointed Oshkosh
City Manager Richard Wollangk to the board to fill a vacancy.
A regional economic focus is "an idea thats
time has come, Mayor Hanna told city and village leaders and lawmakers at the
luncheon. He said single communities aren't the building blocks that form Wisconsin's
economy, regions are.
When Appleton grows the region benefits, and when
the region grows, Appleton benefits, Mayor Hanna said. Making state aids recognize
that reality will benefit the entire state, he said.
The Appleton Post-Crescent's story on the luncheon is here. |
| Mayor Hanna talks
property taxes, economic growth Appleton
Mayor Tim Hanna also gave his suggestions on how to tame the dragon of high property taxes
in an interview with wispolitics.com that is
available as a webcast on its Internet site.
Mayor Hanna's overriding theme: adapt everything state and
local governments do to recognize that Wisconsin is host to a series of regional economies
that don't respect arbitrary political boundary lines, and that acting accordingly will
improve the quality of life in our communities and the revenue picture for state and local
governments.
"If we know that's a reality, we ought to find a way
to work with our neighbors, because we share that economy," Mayor Hanna said.
"You don't grow the economy municipality by
municipality," Mayor Hanna emphasized. "You do it within regions." |

Mayor Tim Hanna
|
| Local governments, he added,
should be given incentives along the lines suggested by the Wisconsin Alliance of Cities
to do that. "If there are no incentives, local
governments that do the heavy lifting on economic development will stop doing it," he
cautioned.
See our proposal here:
http://www.wiscities.org/newsletter86.htm#REDI
. The wispolitics webcast you must use a
Microsoft browser to view it is here:
http://www.wispolitics.com/index.iml?Article=36533
To watch an earlier video interview with Ed, go here. Note that you must
use Internet Explorer non Microsoft browsers won't work.
|

Lisa MacKinnon
|
Another Slap at Local
Government?
Smart Growth repeal will cost taxpayers
When the Legislature's Joint Finance
Committee voted to repeal Wisconsin's Smart Growth Law the other day, legislators claimed
they were working for the taxpayer.
Rep. David Ward (R-Fort Atkinson) said Smart Growth forces local officials
to plan "with a gun to their head."
"Let's allow development to be controlled at the local level," said Sen.
Scott Fitzgerald (R-Juneau), co-chairman of the committee.
It was a vote that, if sustained, will cost the taxpayer in the end, said
Lisa MacKinnon, policy director of 1000 Friends of Wisconsin.
"We
know that planning saves tax dollars. In the long run, communities and the state should
save money as a result of comprehensive planning," MacKinnon said."The inability
of the Joint Finance Committee to see this speaks poorly of their vision." |
At the League-Alliance legislative luncheon
May 19, Gov. Jim Doyle asked local leaders from around the state to fight to restore the
Smart Growth law.
The finance committee vote against repealing
was a bipartisan vote, with two Republicans joining Democrats to support the law. But GOP
opposition to comprehensive planning tarnished one of the shining examples of
bipartisanship from the Thompson era, a former Thompson aide said.
"This was a classic example of
Republicans and Democrats, environmentalists and business people working together on a
problem facing this state," former State Revenue Secretary Mark Bugher, now
director of the UW Research Park in Madison, told The Capital Times. "It was one of
the most important pieces of legislation passed by the Thompson administration, real
landmark land-use legislation. I'm disappointed they would want to reverse that."
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel story
is here.The Capital
Times story is here.
|

|
|
| News Briefs |

...for better...or worse?
|
Neil Peirce: Collaborate or collapse. "Even
today, many people leave urban areas in search of small towns where they expect the old,
informal culture and low costs," Neil Peirce wrote from Augusta, Maine last
month. "But the system has veered off the tracks, with escalating costs and rising
frustrations. "And what's the top culprit?
Sprawl, says Angus King, Maine's immediate past governor," Peirce said in his
nationally syndicated column. "King's planning director, Evan Richert, found that
when a small town in the path of suburbanization passes the 3,500-person mark, citizens
start demanding a town manager, more police and professionalized services and
budgets start to soar."
Richert found 91 fire trucks serving 95,000 people
within 20 miles of Augusta. And not one of the costly trucks was jointly owned, Peirce
wrote.
"We pay due respect to local control but it
comes at a high cost," Peirce quoted King as lamenting. "We have
205,000 school kids in 186 school districts, each with its own superintendent, curriculum,
purchasing office about one superintendent for each 1,200 kids." Column here. |
| Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:
Don't pre-empt cities on minimum wage. Giving up local control over the minimum
wage when lawmakers refuse to act is too high a price to pay for a boost in the pay of
Wisconsin's lowest-paid workers, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel wrote in an
editorial. That's because future low-wage workers held hostage by the Legislature won't
have recourse to their city councils if a minimum wage bill pre-empts local authority, the
newspaper wrote. "If that future Legislature allows the tried-and-true system to work
its magic, everything is dandy. If it intervenes again, the cities will be powerless to
act in their own residents' interest," the Journal Sentinel wrote.
"Taking away the cities' duty and ability to act will only ensure more legislative
obstruction. Wage earners at the lower end deserve consideration now and in the
future." Editorial here.
Sixteen states now have a minimum wage
higher than the federal level of $5.15 per hour, according to TomPaine.com. Story here. |
An Apology
"Dear League of Wisconsin Municipalities
and Wisconsin Alliance of Cities member,
"At Thursday's legislative luncheon, a
fellow alderperson and I distributed flyers to each of the tables regarding the effort to
preempt local minimum wages like those adopted in Madison, Milwaukee, and La Crosse. I
deeply regret both that I failed to identify the source of the flyers and failed to give
due warning to all of the organizers of the event.
"To be clear, although both
organizations stand firmly in opposition to preemption, the words on those flyers were
mine and mine alone and not approved in advance by the League or Alliance. I apologize for
any confusion or inconvenience this may have caused.
Austin King
District 8
Madison, WI" |
|
The transportation bill before Congress misses the
boat. Not to mention the plane, the bus, the train and the family car, according
to Bruce Katz and Robert Puentes of the Brookings Institution. "The current bill
takes an antiquated, anachronistic, and ultimately wasteful approach to transportation
policy," they wrote in the Boston Globe. "It continues to pour more
money into a broken system and makes no attempt at significant policy reform. It assumes
that thousands and thousands of congressional earmarks, representing over $12 billion,
somehow add up to a coherent, fiscally responsible national transportation policy. And it
ensures that America's federal program will function mainly as a Rube Goldbergian revenue
generation and distribution system for the gas tax it collects." Aside from that,
it's a good bill, they added. Just kidding. Column here. |
|