| |

2007-2008 Issues
EXPAND THE
EXPENDITURE RESTRAINT PROGRAM
AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO LEVY LIMITS
The Expenditure Restraint
Program has worked well, and the Wisconsin Alliance of Cities advocates
its expansion.
Levy limits don’t work, and they should be eliminated. There’s no way to
craft a property tax limit that fairly meets the needs of the residents
of Wisconsin’s 1,922 municipalities.
Electric rates are up 49% over
the last decade, and natural gas rates are up 74%. The cost of
health care is expected to double again in the next 10 years. As
a result, any reasonable levy limit imposed on local government
would contain so many exceptions as to be meaningless.
But there is a proven tool to encourage communities to stretch
their property-tax dollars. It is Wisconsin’s Expenditure
Restraint Program.
For more than a decade, it has provided a huge incentive that
has kept general fund spending increases in participating
communities to inflation plus a percentage of new growth.
Initially, the ERP payment was targeted to high-tax rate
communities that restrain spending growth. |

The ERP Program stretches
property tax dollars |
Electric rates are up 49%
over the last decade, and natural gas rates are up 74%. The cost of
health care is expected to double again in the next 10 years. As a
result, any reasonable levy limit imposed on local government would
contain so many exceptions as to be meaningless.
But there is a proven tool to encourage communities to stretch their
property-tax dollars. It is Wisconsin’s Expenditure Restraint Program.
For more than a decade, it has provided a huge incentive that has kept
general fund spending increases in participating communities to
inflation plus a percentage of new growth.
Initially, the ERP payment was targeted to high-tax rate communities
that restrain spending growth.
But today, many communities
that have restrained spending risk falling off the formula due to
declining tax rates, and the formula needs to be retooled to keep ERP
incentives alive for them.
Municipalities qualify for a payment by holding their general-fund
spending growth to no more than inflation plus a portion of growth
attributed to new construction.
Since 2003, the program's annual distribution has been $58.1 million a
year, and despite five increases in its appropriation over the years, if
ERP had increased with inflation, it would have an additional $6.7
million today.
The program is increasingly popular, with the number of participants
growing by nearly a third since 1994.
| |
|
State Total |
|
|
| |
Year |
No.
of Participants |
Appropriation |
|
| |
1994 |
244 |
$42
million |
|
| |
1995 |
249 |
$48
million |
|
| |
1996 |
254 |
$48
million |
|
| |
1997 |
312 |
$48
million |
|
| |
1998 |
289 |
$48
million |
|
| |
1999 |
292 |
$48
million |
|
| |
2000 |
281 |
$57
million |
|
| |
2001 |
270 |
$57
million |
|
| |
2002 |
303 |
$57,569,998 |
|
| |
2003 |
296 |
$58,145,698 |
|
| |
2004 |
306 |
$58,145,698 |
|
| |
2005 |
337 |
$58,145,698 |
|
| |
2006 |
315 |
$58,145,698 |
|
| |
2007 |
318 |
$58,145,698 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|