FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
FRIDAY, FEB. 28, 2003
More: Rich Eggleston
608-257-5881
WIRELESS 911 BILL
LEAVES PROPERTY TAXPAYERS IN LURCH
Madison A new bill to improve emergency assistance to cellular phone users
is a cash cow for giant telecommunications firms, but leaves property taxpayers saddled
with much of the cost of local 911 improvements, a spokesman for Wisconsins major
cities said today.
Edward J. Huck, executive director of the Wisconsin Alliance of Cities, said the bill
has a clear double standard.
It would make local governments second-class partners in the business of getting
emergency help to 911 callers by limiting the number of 911 and emergency dispatch centers
that could receive money for needed equipment to one per county. In any case local
governments could not receive money for "training, equipment, software, records
management, radio communications and mobile data network systems" for emergency
dispatchers.
Yet phone companies would be eligible to receive all their costs incurred "to
purchase, lease, program, install, test, operate, or maintain all data, hardware and
software necessary to comply with the FCC orders" to the phone companies, according
to the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Local governments are limited to one grant per county and grants are limited to
covering only some of the costs of getting information to local dispatchers.But every
phone company subject to FCC orders is eligible to charge its costs to its customers in
the form of a surcharge.
The bill is AB 61. Its chief sponsor is Rep. Phil Montgomery, R-Green Bay. It is
co-sponsored by Reps. Scott Jensen, R-Waukesha; Michael Lehman, R-Hartford; Mark Pettis,
R-Hertel; Karl Van Roy, R-Green Bay; Becky Weber, R-Green Bay; Bob Turner, D-Racine; Jeff
Fitzgerald, R-Beaver Dam; Daniel Vrakas, R-Hartland; and Ann Nischke, R-Waukesha; and
Sens. Joe Leibham, R-Sheboygan; Scott Fitzgerald, R-Juneau; and Roger Breske,
D-Eland.
Huck said the bill is an especially keen disappointment at a time that local
governments across the state are struggling to avoid property tax increases to cope with
Gov. Jim Doyles proposed $110 million cut in state shared revenue to municipalities
and counties next year.
"This is the worst possible time for the Legislature to try to impose new costs on
property taxpayers to provide favors for the phone companies," Huck said.
The bill is to receive executive action by the Assembly Energy & Utilities
Committee at 1 p.m. Tuesday, March 4 in Room 415 Northwest of the Capitol.
AB 61 also absolves phone companies from liability due to their mishandling of 911
calls from cellular customers.
Incredibly, some phone companies are not waiting for the bill to impose a 911 surcharge
on their cellular customers. Theres a federal 911 cost-recovery charge that some
phone companies are already passing along. Cellular phone bills also commonly include a
property tax surcharge a somewhat misleading label because the phone companies pay
no property taxes to local governments.
###